Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1483Keywords:
judicial consideration, civil dispute, court decision, normative legal researchAbstract
This study aims to analyze judicial considerations in the settlement of civil disputes through a normative juridical approach. The focus of the research is directed toward examining how judges assess legal facts and evidence and relate them to applicable legal norms in civil court decisions. This research employs a statutory approach and a case approach, using primary legal materials such as legislation and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials including legal literature and academic journals. The findings indicate that judicial considerations play a central role in determining the quality of civil judgments. Well-structured and reasoned considerations contribute to legal certainty and a sense of justice for the parties, whereas insufficient reasoning may lead to legal uncertainty. Therefore, strengthening the quality of judicial considerations is essential to enhance the effectiveness of civil dispute resolution through judicial mechanisms.
Downloads
References
Aripah, Iip. “Penerapan Asas Kepatutan Dan Keadilan Dalam Putusan Yurisprudensi Perdata.” YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 2 (2023): 70–77.
Army, Eddy. Bukti Elektronik Dalam Praktik Peradilan. Sinar Grafika, 2020.
Farida, Husnul. “Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Hakim Dalam Praktik Peradilan Perdata: Studi Yurisprudensi Terpilih.” YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan 1, no. 3 (2023): 58–66.
Imelda, Chitra, Aman Ma’arij, Irma Mangar, Raju Moh Hazmi, Sukmareni Sukmareni, Mohamad Arsan Abidin, Rosita Indrayati, and Ardiana Hidayah. Logika Dan Argumen Dalam Penalaran Hukum. CV. Gita Lentera, 2024.
Istisofania, Aulia Salma, Ezra Zesika Simbolon, and Patricia Debby Julydya. “ANALISIS TENTANG KEWENANGAN HAKIM DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA LITIGASI PERDATA.” Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies 5, no. 1 (2025): 354–368.
Kandou, Rico Manshold Franklin, Elko Lucky Mamesah, and Ronny Sepang. “Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Setempat Sebagai Bahan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Perdata.” Lex Administratum 11, no. 5 (2023).
Lubis, Andi Hakim, Junaidi Lubis, and Said Rizal. “Optimalisasi Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Hakim Menuju Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Berintegritas Dan Bermartabat.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 5, no. 1 (2022): 12–24.
Masidin, S H. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Analisis Putusan Hakim. Prenada Media, 2023.
Mutmainah, Siti. “Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Sengketa Perdata (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum) Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia), 2023.
Nurwandi, Andri, Sabillah Aisyah Futri, Adam Jordan, Ade Safitri, Citra Dwi Saputri, and Lathifa Khairunnisa. “Pengaruh Faktor Eksternal Terhadap Keputusan Hakim:(Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Kisaran).” Mediation: Journal of Law (2024): 25–35.
Permanasari, Novia. “Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Pusat NO. 10/PID. SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI.” Syntax Idea 3, no. 9 (2021): 2159–2178.
Putri, Sherenika. “PERAN HAKIM DALAM MENJAMIN KESEIMBANGAN HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN PARA PIHAK DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN PERDATA.” Sriwijaya Journal of Private Law (2025): 155–164.
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. “Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Di Pengadilan.” Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17.
Rizkia, Nanda Dwi, and Hardi Fardiansyah. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina, 2023.
Sukadana, Dewa Ayu Putri. “Implikasi Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Hukum Perdata Antara Teori Dan Praktik” (2025).
Syafe’ie, Aliev Dzaky, Ameylia Safira Jesslin Putri, Andre Al Akbar, Atik Abawaiki, Auliya’Ul Rohmah, and Debby Mohammad Revianto. “PERAN LOGIKA DAN PENALARAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN OLEH HAKIM.” Edukreatif: Jurnal Kreativitas dalam Pendidikan 6, no. 1 (2025).
YUSRI, YUSRI. “REKONSTRUKSI REGULASI PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERADILAN PERDATA BERBASIS PADA NILAI KEADILAN.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, 2023.
Zahra, Khansa Laily Az, Moh Fadwa Mufid Al Amjad, Syafa Nabya Maulidian, Septiani Silvia, and Fadilla Azfa Asyifa. “Relevansi Kepentingan Alat-Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Hukum Perdata.” The Juris 8, no. 1 (2024): 95–104.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arci Agwan, Dinda Cahyanih, Hilda Nurlisa, Prayoga Gustiawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
