ANALISIS HUBUNGAN PERSEPSI PENEGAK HUKUM (HAKIM) DENGAN PERSETUJUAN PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i5.1964Keywords:
judges’ perception, Restorative Justice, medical disputes, mediation, restorative justice.Abstract
Medical disputes are legal issues in the field of health that require fair and balanced resolution between medical personnel and patients. The Restorative Justice approach emerges as a non-litigation alternative that emphasizes restoring relationships and achieving peaceful agreements between the disputing parties. The success of this approach largely depends on the perception of law enforcers, particularly judges, who hold the authority in resolving such cases. This study analyzes the relationship between the perception of law enforcers (judges) and their approval of the application of Restorative Justice in resolving medical disputes at the North Jakarta District Court. The research employed an analytical observational method with a cross-sectional design involving 31 judges as respondents. The results showed that most judges had a good perception of Restorative Justice (87.1%) and the majority agreed with its implementation (83.9%). The Chi-Square test produced a p-value of 0.000, indicating a significant relationship between judges’ perception and their level of approval. These findings affirm that judges’ positive understanding of restorative justice principles plays a crucial role in promoting peaceful and humanistic settlement of medical disputes. However, practical implementation still faces challenges such as limited practical experience, lack of regulatory support, and public pressure. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance training and socialization for law enforcers so that the concept of Restorative Justice can be effectively and sustainably implemented.
Downloads
References
Abidova, A., da Silva, P. A., & Moreira, S. (2021). Understanding complaints in the emergency department. Health Services Insights, 14, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211057351
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alghifary, M. G., Sriwijaya, U., & Hukum, F. (2023). RAMA_74201_02011381924388_0028077301_0014098601_01_front_ref.
Beran, R. G. (2013). Legal and forensic medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6
Chen, G. (2023). The effective reduction of violence against doctors through the improvement of medical humanistic care. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16(May), 1403–1407. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S411674
Chia, W. C., Chen, L. S., & Wang, S. T. (2023). The intra-hospital medical dispute burden and capacities: A nationwide survey in Taiwan. Healthcare (Switzerland), 11(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152121
Evans, J. (2024). Public perceptions of restorative justice in Canada. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/NJS-SNJ.html
Hafizah, H., & Fitriasih, S. (2022). Urgensi penyelesaian dugaan kesalahan medis melalui restorative justice. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4884
Hafizah, H., & Fitriasih, S. (2022). Urgensi penyelesaian dugaan kesalahan medis melalui restorative justice. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5. https://makassar.terkini.id/polisi-tindaklanjuti-kasus-dugaan-malapraktik-di-rsud-bantaeng/
Iberahim. (2022). Peran mediator pada tingkat keberhasilan mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa Kelas IB.
Konstitusi, M. (2023). Mahkamah Konstitusi risalah sidang perihal pengujian materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 tentang penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2002 tentang pemberantasan. https://mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/risalah/9670_Risalah-pdf_PERKARA NOMOR 103.PUU-XXI.2023 tgl. 5 Maret 2024.pdf
Liu, Y., Wang, P., & Bai, Y. (2022). The influence factors of medical disputes in Shanghai and implications – from the perspective of doctor, patient and disease. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08490-5
Muhaimin, M. (2019). Restoratif justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana ringan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.185-206
Nickson, R., & Neikirk, A. (2024). Restorative justice in healthcare settings: Better outcomes for patients and medical professionals. Alternative Law Journal, 49(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X241248781
Pratama, N. A., & Pangestika, E. Q. (2024). Peran aparat penegak hukum dalam mendukung kebijakan restorative justice di Indonesia. 5(1), 545–554.
Rich, J. I., & Djaja, B. (2024). Penerapan prinsip restoratif justice terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum (Studi kasus Putusan Nomor: 28/Pid.B/2022/PN.LBB). UNES Law Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2
Rivaldy, M., Wulandari, S. L., & Tanggahma, B. (2024). Pengaruh media sosial pada persepsi publik terhadap sistem peradilan: Analisis sentimen di Twitter. UNES Law Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1
Robinson, G., & Shapland, J. (2008). Reducing recidivism: A task for restorative justice? British Journal of Criminology, 48(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn002
Setyawan, B. S. (2019). Kebijakan restorative justice dalam upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana medis di Indonesia. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 2(2), 678–693. https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v2i2.5180
Shen, Y., Li, G., Tang, Z., Wang, Q., Zhang, Z., Hao, X., & Han, X. (2024). Analysis of the characteristics, efficiency, and influencing factors of third-party mediation mechanisms for resolving medical disputes in public hospitals in China. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19366-0
Shen, Y., et al. (2023). Analysis of the characteristics and risk factors affecting the judgment results of medical damage liability disputes in 3172 second-instance and retrial cases in China. Human Resources for Health, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-023-00832-6
Si Boro, E. M., Rahmad Sujud Hidayat, Sendi Sanjaya, Fikri Latukau, & Gandung Sulistyo Nugroho. (2024). Efektivitas penerapan restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Humaniora (Eksishum), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.63494/eksishum.v4i1.130
Studdert, D. M. (2024). Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. Survey of Anesthesiology, 50(6), 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000248494.35639.e1
Subekti, H. T., Dahlan, D., & Sembiring, T. B. (2024). The role of compensation in medical dispute resolution: Legal and ethical implications. 1(2), 26–35.
Suhariyanto, B., Mulyadi, L., & Hakim, M. R. (2021). Kajian restorative justice dari perspektif filosofis, normatif, praktik, dan persepsi hakim (Pertama). Kencana.
Suratman. (2023). Keadilan restoratif (restorative justice) sebagai upaya penyelesaian sengketa medis berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3
Trisnadi, S. (2017). Perlindungan hukum profesi dokter dalam penyelesaian sengketa medis. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v4i1.1656
Tzeni, V., Stephan, P., & Ivo, A. (2014). Developing judicial training for restorative justice: Towards a European approach. Final Research Report. http://www.verwey-jonker.nl/
UU No. 36 Tahun 2009. (2009). Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009.
Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Experience of medical disputes, medical disturbances, verbal and physical violence, and burnout among physicians in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556517
Zeng, Y., et al. (2018). Analysis of current situation and influencing factor of medical disputes among different levels of medical institutions based on the game theory in Xiamen of China: A cross-sectional survey. Medicine (United States), 97(38). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012501
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tiffany Pramita Apsari, Setyo Trisnadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
