EKUIVALENSI KESEPADANAN DENDA ATAS KERUSAKAN EKOLOGIS: ANALISIS QIRAAT Q.S AL-MAIDAH AYAT 95
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/at-taklim.v3i6.2288Keywords:
qirā’at, mitsliyyah, QS. Al-Mā’idah 95Abstract
This research examines the variations in qirā’āt (canonical recitations) of Surah Al-Mā’idah verse 95, focusing on the phrase fajazā’un mithlu mā qatala mina al-an‘ām and its implications for meaning construction and legal interpretation. The diversity of qirā’āt in this verse presents not only phonological differences but also variations in syntactic and semantic structures, particularly regarding the position of the word mithl, which can be interpreted as an adjective (na‘at), a genitive construction (iḍāfah), or a direct object (maf‘ūl bih). These distinctions influence the understanding of the concept of mithliyyah (resemblance) in determining kaffārah (expiation) for violations of iḥrām. Using a qualitative approach based on library research, this study analyzes qirā’āt data from classical tafsīr and qirā’āt texts, correlating them with legal constructions across various schools of Islamic jurisprudence (madhāhib). The findings indicate that each qirā’ah provides nuanced meanings: some emphasize general resemblance, others highlight more specific equivalence, and some underscore the implementational aspect of the penalty. These differences lead to two primary tendencies in jurisprudence: the approach of physical resemblance (al-mithliyyah al-ṣūriyyah) and the approach of value equivalence (al-qīmah). This study concludes that the diversity of qirā’āt does not alter the fundamental substance of the law but rather enriches the scope of ijtihād in determining fair forms of compensation.
Downloads
References
Abu Hayyan al-Andalusi. Al-Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ. Juz 3. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, t.t.
Abu Hayyan al-Andalusi. Tafsir al-Bahr al-Muhith. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.
Al-Mawardi. Al-Ḥāwī al-Kabīr fī Fiqh Madzhab al-Imām al-Syāfi‘ī. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1999.
Al-Qurtubi. Al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Juz 6. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, t.t.
Al-Sarakhsi. Al-Mabsūṭ. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 1993.
Al-Syatibi. Al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Syarī‘ah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Al-Tabari. Jāmi‘ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Juz 8. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, t.t.
Al-Zamakhshari. Al-Kashshāf ‘an Ḥaqā’iq al-Tanzīl. Juz 1. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, t.t.
Azizah, Imroatul, et al. “Ancaman terhadap Keanekaragaman Hayati Kalimantan: Implementasi Nilai Persatuan dan Keadilan Ekologis.” Civic Society Research and Education: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 2 (2025): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.57094/jpkn.v6i2.3909.
Basri, Basri, dan Fikri Hamdani. “Implikasi Perbedaan Qira’at dalam Istinbath Hukum: Analisis Qira’at dari Segi Muthlaq dan Muqayyad.” Farabi 17, no. 2 (2020): 163–179. https://doi.org/10.30603/jf.v17i2.1868.
Fitriyati Diqi, Intan Diana. “Dampak Eksploitasi terhadap Alam.” Al-Mustafid: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies 3, no. 2 (2024): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.30984/mustafid.v3i2.997.
Hamed (Farhang) Khani (Mehrvash), dan Monireh Sadat Madani. “The Implication for the Letter ‘Aw’ in Verse 95 of Surah Al-Ma’idah; A New Reading of the Narrations Predicted on the Theory of Sequence.” Religious Researches 18, no. 1 (2022): 271–299. https://doi.org/10.22059/jorr.2021.288213.1008588.
Ibn ‘Asyur. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Juz 6. Tunis: Dar al-Tunisiyyah, t.t.
Ibn Rusyd. Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 2004.
Intan, et al. “Urgensi Mempelajari Qira’at dan Pengaruh Perbedaannya pada Istinbath Hukum.” Jurnal Tawadhu 7, no. 2 (2023): 139–151. https://doi.org/10.52802/twd.v7i2.580.
Khufaya, Jihad, et al. “Fenomena Hukum Islam di Masa Modern: Upaya Harmonisasi antara Eksistensi dan Relevansi.” Mutawasith: Jurnal Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2021): 128–147. https://doi.org/10.47971/mjhi.v4i2.366.
Malik bin Anas. Al-Muwaṭṭa’ (dengan syarah Al-Zarqani). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Nafisah, Mamluatun. “Alquran dan Konservasi Lingkungan (Suatu Pendekatan Maqasid al-Sharī‘ah).” Al Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 2, no. 1 (2018): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v2i1.405.
Nauval, M. Mirza Azizin. “Ekoteologi Islam dalam Praktik Kajian Fatwa MUI No. 86 Tahun 2023 dan Sikap Masyarakat.” Jurnal Pemuliaan Lingkungan Hidup dan Sumber Daya Alam 2, no. 02 (2025). https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/article/view/25085.
“Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup dalam Perspektif Islam: Tinjauan Ayat-Ayat Alqur’an.” Diakses 19 Mei 2026. https://journalshub.org/index.php/jebaku/article/view/5435.
Sholehuddin, L. “Ekologi dan Kerusakan Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an.” Al-Fanar: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2021): 113–134. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v4n2.113-134.
Syaukani, Muhammad bin Ali al-. Fatḥ al-Qadīr al-Jāmi‘ baina Fannay al-Riwāyah wal Dirāyah min ‘Ilm al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Dar Ibn Kathir, 1994.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maudy Muzalifah Azzahra, Siti Faridah, Tanfiu Billatifa, Najib Irsyadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
