MENGUJI KETAHANAN SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL INDONESIA DI TENGAH POLARISASI POLITIK YANG MENINGKAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/at-taklim.v2i6.490Keywords:
Presidential system, political polarization, Indonesian democracy, checks and balances, political reformAbstract
The presidential system in Indonesia is designed to ensure governmental stability through a strict separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. However, political developments following the 2024 general elections indicate that sharp political polarization has the potential to undermine the system's effectiveness. This study aims to evaluate the resilience of Indonesia's presidential system in facing contemporary political dynamics, with a particular focus on the implications of elite polarization, legal controversies surrounding Constitutional Court rulings, the erosion of legal legitimacy and the rule of law, as well as the declining public trust in state institutions. The research employs a normative-empirical approach through literature analysis, regulatory review, and secondary data from credible news sources. The findings suggest that while Indonesia’s presidential system remains relevant for maintaining governmental stability, it remains vulnerable to distortion if the system of checks and balances is not strengthened. This study recommends the reform of the party system, the strengthening of institutional independence, and the enhancement of political education to prevent deepening polarization and to ensure the sustainability of substantive democracy in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Pemisahan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2012). Demokrasi dan Konstitusi di Indonesia: Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Konstitusi Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Bappenas. (2018). Evaluasi Pemisahan Kekuasaan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Jakarta: Bappenas.
Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2024). Bertelsmann Transformation Index (BTI) 2024: Indonesia Country Report.
Bivitri Susanti. (2020). Politik Hukum Penguatan Kewenangan Presiden Melalui Pelemahan KPK. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol. 9 No. 1, 1-20.
Carley, K.M., et al. (2022). Profiling Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior in Indonesian Political Discourse. arXiv preprint.
Farida Indrati, Maria. (2020). Hukum Konstitusi Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Sinar Grafika.
Honna, J. (2024). Hiperpresidensialisme dan Pelemahan Lembaga Pengawas. Jurnal Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.
Indikator Politik Indonesia. (2024). Survei Nasional Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Lembaga Negara Pasca Pemilu 2024.
Lane, M. (2023). Polarisations in Indonesia: Distinguishing the Real from the Rhetorical. ISEAS Perspective No. 67.
Lane, M. (2024). Understanding Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Elections: A New Polarisation Evolving. ISEAS Perspective 2024/8.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown Publishing Group.
Linz, Juan. "The Perils of Presidentialism." Journal of Democracy, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1990): 51–69.
Mietzner, Marcus. "Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Polarization, Identity Politics, and the Rise of Executive Power." Journal of Democracy, Vol. 32, No. 1 (2021): 37–51.
Montesquieu. The Spirit of Laws. Terjemahan Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller, dan Harold S. Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Madison, J. (1788). The Federalist Papers No. 51.
O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal Accountability and the Quality of Democracy.
Slater, D. (2018). Party Cartelization, Indonesian Style: Presidential Power Sharing and the Contingency of Democratic Opposition. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(1), 23–46.
Universitas Padjadjaran. (2025). Political Polarization in the 2024 Simultaneous Elections, Internal Research Report.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Nyoman Dudy Dharmawan, Nurmansyah, Elsy A Joltuwu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
