Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Wanprestasi Artis dalam Kontrak Eksklusif: Studi Kasus MD Entertainment melawan Rezky Aditya Studi Putusan Nomor 536/PK/Pdt/2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i12.1361Keywords:
breach of contract; exclusive contract; civil liability; third party; entertainment industry.Abstract
The dispute between PT MD Entertainment and Rezky Aditya in Supreme Court Decision No. 536 PK/Pdt/2015 highlights issues surrounding the enforcement of exclusive contracts between artists and production houses. This study examines the forms of breach of contract committed by the artist, the resulting legal liabilities, and the extent to which third parties may be held responsible for involving the artist despite knowing the existence of an exclusive agreement. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and case approaches, the analysis shows that the artist’s act of working with another production house while the contract was still in effect constitutes a breach that gives rise to compensation obligations. This decision underscores the importance of legal certainty and adherence to the principles of freedom of contract and pacta sunt servanda in the entertainment industry.
Downloads
References
Brilianto, H. F., & Marpaung, D. S. (2022). Exceptio non adimpleti contractus pada kasus wanprestasi dalam perjanjian jual beli. Widya Yuridika, 5(2), 253–264.
Christina, L., & Surajiman, M. P. (2022). Kajian Hukum Akibat Wanprestasi Pada Perjanjian Kerja Antara Artis Dan Dan Rumah Produksi (Studi Kasus Jefri Nihol Dan Falcon Picture). National Journal Of Law, 7(2), 919-929.
Fanani, M., Nugraha, S. N., & Muaziz, M. H. (2025). Penerapan prinsip exceptio non adimpleti contractus dalam perkara wanprestasi pada perjanjian lisan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 933–943.
Gultom, E., Alexander, J., & Angelina, N. (2024). Efektivitas implementasi ajaran exceptio non adimpleti contractus berdasarkan dinamika hukum. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(12), 1–11.
Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Pasal 1320 tentang syarat sah perjanjian.
Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Pasal 1338 ayat (1).
Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Pasal 1338 ayat (3) tentang pelaksanaan perjanjian dengan itikad baik.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan No. 536 PK/Pdt/2015, pertimbangan hukum.
Mandacan, W. E. (2025). Akibat hukum dari wanprestasi dalam kontrak perjanjian hukum perdata Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 14(2), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muniratri Rachmita, Jingga Septira Arazea, Ibrahim Saleh Harahap, Naufal Jiro Rizayanto, Nigeel Jose Mourinho (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
