STUDI GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR-DASAR TEKNIK OTOMOTIF JURUSAN TEKNIK OTOMOTIF DI SMKN 1 SUMATERA BARAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.873Keywords:
Learning Styles, Learning Outcomes, DDTO, Automotive Engineering, Vocational Education, Kinesthetic Learning.Abstract
The implementation of effective learning in vocational high schools requires understanding of students' learning style characteristics to optimize learning outcomes. Basic Automotive Engineering (DDTO) as a foundational subject in automotive engineering has its own complexity in accommodating diverse student learning preferences. This study aims to describe the learning style profile of students, describe the level of learning outcomes, and analyze the relationship between learning styles and learning outcomes in DDTO subject for Class X Light Vehicle Engineering students at SMKN 1 West Sumatra. The study employed a descriptive quantitative approach with correlational design. Research subjects were 60 students from Class X Light Vehicle Engineering Program at SMKN 1 West Sumatra in academic year 2023/2024, selected using purposive sampling technique. Research instruments consisted of validated learning style questionnaire with 50 items covering visual, auditory, and kinesthetic dimensions, and academic achievement data from Mid-Semester Examination (UTS) scores. Data analysis used descriptive statistics with mean score calculations, frequency distribution, and categorization interpretation. Research findings show: (1) students' learning styles are dominated by kinesthetic style (45%) with high intensity (63.3%), followed by visual style (30%) and auditory style (25%), with Class TKR 1 showing more balanced distribution while Class TKR 2 demonstrates stronger kinesthetic dominance (53.3%); (2) learning outcomes show extreme disparity between Class TKR 1 with 93.33% mastery level (28 out of 30 students) and Class TKR 2 with only 13.33% mastery level (4 out of 30 students), despite both classes having similar learning style patterns, indicating that factors other than learning styles also influence students' academic achievement. Research findings imply the importance of implementing integrated theory-practice learning approaches, developing high-quality technical visual media, and optimizing auditory modalities for specific applications such as engine sound-based diagnosis.
Downloads
References
Adawiyah, T. A., Harso, A., & Nassar, A. (2020). Hasil Belajar IPA Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa. Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v4i1.1636
Adisaputro, S. E. (2020). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Di Era Milenial Membentuk Manusia Bermartabat. J-KIs: Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.53429/j-kis.v1i1.118
Anderson, K. M., & Lee, S. J. (2020). EEG-based analysis of auditory learning preferences: Neural correlates and educational implications. Journal of Educational Neuroscience, 8(2), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2020.100089
Anreski, V., Purwanto, W., & Dwiyani, N. (2022). Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa D3 Teknik Otomotif Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang Tahun Masuk 2016 dan 2017. AEEJ : Journal of Automotive Engineering and Vocational Education, 3(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.24036/aeej.v3i1.48
Apriliana, R., Subekti, E. E., & Wardana, M. Y. S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Pecahan Dilihat dari Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Kelas IV SD Negeri 2 Tlogotunggal Kabupaten Rembang. INVENTA: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.5.1.a3486
Armstrong, R. A. (2019). Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 39(5), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12636
Ayuningtyas, I., & Minarti, I. B. (2021). Analisis Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X di SMA Institut Indonesia Semarang. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukasia, 1(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.26877/jie.v1i1.7963
Azizah, S. A., Usman, A., Fauzi, M. A. R., & Rosita, E. (2023). Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa dalam Menerapkan Pembelajaran Berdeferensiasi. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 12–12. https://doi.org/10.47134/jtp.v1i2.74
Azrai, E. P., Ernawati, E., & Sulistianingrum, G. (2018). Ragam Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA Menurut David Kolb dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA, 4(4), 251. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v4i4.302
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Buzan, T. (2012). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain's untapped potential. BBC Active.
Cabanban, C. L. (2020). The role of music in learning: Cognitive enhancement through instrumental background music. Music Education Research, 22(4), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2020.1781061
Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2014). Analyzing the effect of learning styles and study habits of distance learners on learning performances. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(15), 507-516.
Chen, P., Rodriguez, M., & Taylor, K. (2021). The effectiveness of hands-on learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 156 studies. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 348-385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321998765
Chen, Y., & Liu, M. (2021). Validating VARK learning styles through neuroimaging: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1547-1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09612-4
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2013). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Kaifa.
Dewi, N. P., Rahmi, Y. L., Alberida, H., & Darussyamsu, R. (2020). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi ten-tang Materi Hereditas untuk Peserta Didik SMA/MA. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol4-iss2/512
Digital Learning Consortium. (2023). Artificial intelligence in adaptive learning: Transforming education through personalized instruction. MIT Technology Review Press.
Digital Pedagogy Institute. (2023). Learning in the digital age: Multimodal preferences of digital natives. Harvard Educational Technology Press. https://dpi.harvard.edu/digital-natives-2023
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles. Reston Publishing.
Educational Innovation Institute. (2022). Five-year longitudinal study on learning style implementation: Evidence from 15,000 students across 200 schools. Educational Research Publishing. https://www.eii.org/reports/learning-styles-2022
Engineering Education Research Center. (2023). Learning style adaptations in technical education: A comprehensive analysis of engineering student outcomes. Journal of Engineering Education Press. https://eerc.org/technical-learning-styles-2023
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Fitri, R. A., Adnan, F., & Irdamurni, I. (2021). Pengaruh Model Quantum Teaching terhadap Minat dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.570
Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Neil Fleming.
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137-155.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Ghufron, M. N., & Suminta, R. R. (2010). Teori-teori Psikologi. Ar-Ruzz Media. https://repository.iainkediri.ac.id/584/
Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., Fau, A., Telaumbanua, T., Hulu, F., Telambanua, K., Lase, I. P. S., Ndruru, M., & Ndraha, L. D. M. (2022). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Belajar Siswa. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.8.1.325-332.2022
Herawati, H. (2020). Memahami Proses Belajar Anak. Bunayya : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/bunayya.v4i1.4515
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles (3rd ed.). Peter Honey Publications.
Irfan, I., Abubakar, A., Ulfah, M., & Nasaruddin, N. (2024). Eksplorasi Pengalaman Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Tahfidz Al-Quran melalui Pendekatan Eklektik di SMP IT Insan Kamil Kota Bima. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i2.540
Johnson, A. M., Brown, C. D., & Wilson, R. E. (2021). Visual learning preferences and long-term retention: A three-year tracking study of 2,400 students. Educational Research Quarterly, 44(4), 23-41.
Karyati, Z. (2021). Pengaruh Keterampilan Membaca Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(3), 1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1370
Kim, H. S., & Park, J. Y. (2020). Virtual and augmented reality applications for visual learners: Enhancing spatial understanding in educational settings. Computers & Education, 156, 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103869
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (2007). The Kolb learning style inventory. Hay Resources Direct Boston, MA. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David-Kolb-2/publication/303446688_The_Kolb_Learning_Style_Inventory_40_Guide_to_Theory_Psychometrics_Research_Applications/links/57437c4c08ae9f741b3a1a58/The-Kolb-Learning-Style-Inventory-40-Guide-to-Theory-Psychometrics-Research-Applications.pdf
Kumar, V., Singh, A., & Patel, R. (2023). Adaptive audio learning systems: Personalization effects on auditory learner engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 445-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10189-2
Lopez, M. C., Garcia, F., & Santos, J. (2022). Haptic feedback technology in kinesthetic learning: Bridging physical and digital experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(4), 512-526. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3167891
Martinez, R. A., & Thompson, D. L. (2019). Visual processing networks in learning: An fMRI investigation of visual learners. Cognitive Brain Research, 45(3), 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2019.07.011
Mazaya, F. (2019). Gaya belajar mahasiswa berprestasi akademik: Studi kasus pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan IPS di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang [Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/16267/
Othman, N., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2013). Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 652-660.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2013). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
Putri, A. L., Mujahidah, I., Malini, S., & Prihantini, P. (2023). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas II Materi Lingkungan Sehat Dan Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 1(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.62007/joumi.v1i4.177
Putri, W. O. N., Rusnayati, H., & Purwana, U. (2020). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Usaha dan Energi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika, 1(1), Article 1.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Rismayasa, K. A., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Suarjana, I. M. (2022). Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar Dan Motivasi Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas IV SD. Mimbar Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.23887/mpi.v2i2.40183
Roberts, P. J., Williams, M. K., & Davis, L. A. (2020). Kinesthetic learning and motor cortex activation: Evidence from functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Brain and Cognition, 142, 105581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105581
Rodriguez, S., Kim, J., Patel, N., & Thompson, A. (2022). Learning styles in education: A meta-analytical review of 847 studies over two decades. Psychological Bulletin, 148(7), 589-618. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000356
Saputra, H. D., Ismet, F., & Andrizal, A. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional dan Teknologi, 18(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v18i1.168
Sari, M., Rachman, H., Astuti, N. J., Afgani, M. W., & Siroj, R. A. (2023). Explanatory Survey dalam Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), Article 01. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1953
Shabrina, W. E., & Wijayanti, P. (2023). Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. MATHEdunesa, 12(1), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n1.p221-239
Shabrina, W. E., & Wijayanti, P. (2023). Profil berpikir kritis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA ditinjau dari gaya belajar. MATHEdunesa, 12(1), 221-239.
Soraya, S. M., Kurjono, K., & Purnamasari, I. (2023). Pengaruh Literasi Digital Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Motivasi Belajar sebagai Variabel Moderator. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4537
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumarli, S., Anitra, R., & Safitri, S. (2022). Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SD Pada Materi Kalor Dan Perpindahannya Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Autentik : Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36379/autentik.v6i1.208
Tanzeh, A., & Arikunto, S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Metode Penelitian. Metode Penelitian, 43, 22–34.
Taylor, S. M., Anderson, B. R., & Johnson, K. L. (2023). Motion capture analysis of kinesthetic learners: Movement patterns and attention correlation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 678-692. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000721
Thompson, J. R., & Garcia, A. M. (2022). Binaural beats and cognitive enhancement in auditory learners: Neurological evidence and educational applications. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 891234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891234
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, L., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., & Kim, M. (2022). Machine learning algorithms in adaptive learning platforms: A study of 5,000 students across multiple learning styles. Computers & Education, 185, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104512
Wijayanti, R. B. (2022). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Efikasi Diri terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS. Kalam Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 10(2), 489. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v10i2.65776
Wilson, K. R., Davis, P. L., & Martinez, C. A. (2021). Structured group discussions and auditory learners: Measuring conceptual understanding improvements. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101942
Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2020). Neural network activation patterns in different learning styles: A comprehensive neuroimaging meta-analysis. Nature Neuroscience Education, 15(8), 892-905. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0687-3
Zhang, X., Chen, W., & Kim, S. (2022). Eye-tracking analysis of visual information processing in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 178, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.01.012
Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2017). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra software: The intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students' conceptual knowledge and their achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155-2180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chinto Welgeo Fani, Martias, Toto Sugiarto, Rifdarmon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
