Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Supplier Kain dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Studi Kasus: NTHM Apparel Indonesia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i9.944Keywords:
NTHM Apparel Indonesia, Supplier Performance Assessment, SAW, TOPSIS, Decision AnalysisAbstract
Suppliers play a crucial role in ensuring smooth production. Supplier performance assessments are essential for prioritizing and mitigating the risk of delays. NTHM Apparel Indonesia, a custom jersey manufacturer with a Make-to-Order system, frequently faces challenges when raw materials run out, particularly when suppliers are out of stock or late in delivering, resulting in production delays. This situation forces the company to choose suppliers with stock without considering price due to time constraints. This leads to greater reliance on a few suppliers with limited stock and order queues with other companies. This study assessed five fabric suppliers (Bandung, Solo, Jogja, Wonosobo, Semarang) based on seven criteria: quality, delivery, warranty/claim, price, reciprocal agreements, communication system, and availability of raw material stock using the SAW and TOPSIS methods. The results showed that the Jogja supplier received the highest score (0.78061), making it the top priority, followed by Bandung (0.571858), Solo (0.526222), Semarang (0.472904), and finally Wonosobo (0.297241).
Downloads
References
[1] Arundaa, R., Kalua, A. L., & Ratulangi, U. S. (2023). Implementasi Multiple Attribute Decision Making Dalam Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. 1(January), 77–87.
[2] Hadikurniawati, W., Nugraha, I. A., & Cahyono, T. D. (2021). Implementasi Metode Hybrid Saw-Topsis Dalam Multi Attribute Decision Making Pemilihan Laptop. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 7(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v7i2.907
[3] Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). T Welf T H Edit Ion Oper At Ions.
[4] Melani, A. A., & Bachtiar, L. (2022). Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kenaikan Pangkat PNS Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode TOPSIS dan SAW. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 4(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v4i2.4471
[5] Much Ibnu Subroto, I., & Kurniadi, D. (2022). Seleksi Calon Siswa Baru pada Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Jurnal Transistor Elektro Dan Informatika (TRANSISTOR EI, 4(1), 49–56. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/EI/article/view/27710
[6] Nst, K. K., Zufria, I., & Fakhriza, M. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kelayakan Kredit Usaha Rakyat Dengan Menggunakan Metode Saw & Topsis. Jurnal Responsif : Riset Sains Dan Informatika, 6(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.51977/jti.v6i1.1552
[7] Oleh, D., & Aji Prasetyo, B. (2022). Pemilihan Pemasok Bahan Baku Kain Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Dan Technique for Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) (Studi Kasus Di Umkm Karisma Collection) Laporan Tugas Akhir.
[8] Pujotomo, D., Umaindra, M. A., & Wicaksono, P. A. (2018). Perancangan Model Pemilihan Supplier Produk Cetakan Dengan Menggunakan Grey Based Topsis (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Islam Sultan Agung Semarang). J@ti Undip : Jurnal Teknik Industri, 13(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.13.2.99-108
[9] Rendi Haryono Septy, & Devega, M. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Tunai (Blt) Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dan Saw (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Lurah Limbungan). ZONAsi: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 4(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.31849/zn.v4i1.9568
[10] Rifa, A. (2019). Proses Pengambilan Keputusan. 1–4.
[11] Risandika, H., Agustini, S. P., & Octariadi, B. C. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi SMA Islam Swasta Di Kota Pontianak Menggunakan Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS. Jurnal Fasilkom, 13(02), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v13i02.5178
[12] Salsana, B., Simanjuntak, A., Simanjuntak, D., & Haulian Siboro, B. A. (2021). Penerapan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS untuk Pemilihan Vendor Menempah Produk Marble. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 11(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.25105/jti.v11i1.9663
[13] Sanhar, F. P. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) SEBAGAI SISTEM PENUNJANG PENILAIAN KINERJA SUPPLIER (Studi Kasus : APOTEK SEKAWAN) (F. P. Sanhar (ed.); 2023rd ed.). http://repository.unissula.ac.id/35609/
[14] Sintiya Rismayanti, Suryo Adi Wibowo, Y. A. P. (2021). Implementasi Kombinasi Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Untuk Seleksi Beasiswa Kartu Indonesia Pintar. 5(1), 349–356.
[15] Sofyan, H., Nur, Y., Haris, S., & Yudha, S. (2023). Pemilihan Supplier Material Baja Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS : Studi Kasus di PT . XSF Selection of Steel Material Suppliers Using the TOPSIS Method : Case Study at PT . XSF. Teknologika, 13(2), 1–9.
[16] Susanto, I. H., Subroto, imam M. I., & Mustafaa. (2022). Sistem Rekomendasi Pencarian Tempat Klinik Hewan Peliharaan Menggunakan Metode Haversine dan Metode Topsis. Jurnal Transistor Elektro Dan Informatika , 4(2), 109–118.
[17] Triantaphyllou, Evangelos. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Surya Saputra, Eli Mas’idah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
