Penerapan Kebijakan Asas Tunggal Pancasila dan Implikasinya terhadap Integrasi Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1178Keywords:
Pancasila, New Order, sole principle, ideology, political policyAbstract
This study aims to explore the history of the implementation of the Sole Principle of Pancasila during the New Order era. This policy was enacted in 1985 under the administration of President Suharto, requiring all political parties and mass organizations to adopt Pancasila as the sole ideological foundation of their organizations. The implementation of the sole principle was intended to strengthen national unity and prevent division caused by differing ideologies, particularly as an effort to counter the threats of communism and religious fundamentalism. The New Order period, which began in 1966, is known as an era of political stability and economic development, but it was also marked by the consolidation of government power through various repressive policies, including the enforcement of the sole principle. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method through a literature study approach. The findings indicate that the sole principle of Pancasila was used as a tool to control political life and to restrict ideologies deemed contrary to the state ideology. However, the policy also drew criticism for limiting freedom of expression and imposing ideological uniformity in organizational life in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Hasan, Z . (2024). Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. CV Alinea Multimedia. hlm 2.
Tap MPR No. II/MPR/1983 tentang Pedoman Penghayatan dan Pengamalan Pancasila (P4).
Lihat Rusli Karim (1992). Negara dan Ideologi: Politik Orde Baru .Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta,45.
Alfian, Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi dalam Berbagai Aspek Kehidupan Bangsa (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1981), hlm. 72.
Deliar Noer, Gerakan Modern Islam di Indonesia 1900–1942 (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1982), hlm. 114.
Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019), hlm 6.
Nugroho Notosusanto, Orde Baru dan Pancasila (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1983), hlm. 33.
Soeharto, Pembangunan Nasional dan Stabilitas Politik (Jakarta: Citra Lestari, 1986), hlm. 18
Arbi Sanit, Sistem Politik Indonesia: Kestabilan, Konflik dan Integrasi Nasional (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1985), hlm. 59.
Ahmad Syafii Maarif, Islam dan Masalah Kenegaraan (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1985), hlm. 88.
Tap MPR No. II/MPR/1978 dan UU No. 8 Tahun 1985.
Nugroho Notosusanto, Pancasila dan UUD 1945 sebagai Sumber Tertib Hukum Indonesia (Jakarta: BP7, 1985), hlm. 44.
Rusli Karim, Negara dan Ideologi: Politik Orde Baru, hlm. 48
Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam (HMI) mengalami tekanan setelah menolak asas tunggal. Lihat Abdul Gaffar Karim, Demokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007), hlm. 92.
Arbi Sanit, Sistem Politik Indonesia, hlm. 60.
Alfian. Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi dalam Berbagai Aspek Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa, dan Bernegara. Jakarta: BP7 Pusat, 1990.
Hermawan Sulistyo. Politik Orde Baru dan Hegemoni Negara. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 1998.
Hans Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949), hlm. 124.
Suparlan, Penataran P4 dan Pembentukan Karakter Bangsa (Jakarta: LIPI, 1987), hlm. 31.
Deliar Noer, Gerakan Modern Islam di Indonesia 1900–1942 (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1982), hlm. 289
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ilka Fajar Alief (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










