ANALISIS ACTOR NETWORK THEORY DALAM IMPLEMENTASI KEARSIPAN DIGITAL DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2310Keywords:
SRIKANDI; Mobilization; Actor-Network Theory; Digital Transformation; Records Management; Active UsersAbstract
The digital transformation of Indonesian records management through SRIKANDI (Integrated Dynamic Records Information System) faces a fundamental challenge at the actor-network mobilization stage. Although registered users reached 1,491,392 accounts, ANRI's 2025 Accountability and Performance Report reveals that 73%, or 1,089,341, are inactive users. This reflects a critical gap between formal enrolment and substantive mobilization within the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) framework. This article integrates findings from ANRI's 2024 external archival supervision reports to analyze mobilization barriers at the provincial and district/city levels. Supervision results indicate that while all 34 provincial governments possess live SRIKANDI accounts, only 23 provinces (67.6%) actively use the system with transactions exceeding 30% of regional work units. At the district/city level, of 84 sampled governments, 10 (11.9%) have not accelerated implementation at all. Drawing on Callon's (1986) ANT, this article argues that mobilization failure stems not from technical deficiencies alone, but from fragile actor-interest translation, regulatory-infrastructure ecosystem fragmentation, and the absence of organic mobilization mechanisms beyond regulatory pressure. The article offers strategic recommendations centered on strengthening actor value internalization, continuous technical capacity building, and digital records policy harmonization.
Downloads
References
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge.
Hanseth, O., & Monteiro, E. (1997). Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 7(4), 183–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(97)00008-8
Indonesia, A. N. R. (2024a). Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Kearsipan Nasional Tingkat Daerah.
Indonesia, A. N. R. (2024b). Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Kearsipan Nasional Tingkat Pusat Tahun 2024. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Indonesia, A. N. R. (2025). Laporan Akuntabilitas dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
Meiyani, E., & Hardi, R. (2024). Transformasi Digital dan Pemerintahan Responsif. In M. R. Akbar (Ed.), Eureka Media Aksara. Eureka Media Aksara.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24.
Prabowo, T. J. W., Astuti, E. S., & Susilo, H. (2018). Barriers to E-Government Adoption in Indonesia Local Government. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2018.090280
Wahyuni, S. (2022). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi adopsi sistem informasi kearsipan SRIKANDI di instansi pemerintah pusat. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 7(1), 45–68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bambang Aditio, Aldri Finaldi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
