KEJAHATAN KORUPSI OLEH KORPORASI GLOBAL MERUPAKAN ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP CELAH REGULASI DALAM HUKUM EKONOMI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Desi RahmaWati Magister Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sahid Author
  • Ani Purwati Magister Hukum Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sahid Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.830

Keywords:

Corruption, Global Corporations, Regulatory Loopholes, Economic Law, Corporate Criminal Liability

Abstract

Corruption committed by global corporations is a complex form of transnational economic crime with far-reaching impacts on a nation’s legal stability and economic integrity. This study aims to provide a juridical analysis of regulatory loopholes in Indonesian economic law exploited by foreign corporations to evade legal prosecution, while comparing them with international legal standards. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, and case study approaches. The findings reveal that the main weaknesses lie in the absence of extraterritorial jurisdiction, weak enforcement mechanisms against corporations, and the suboptimal application of the beneficial ownership principle. A comparison with the United States’ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act, and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention highlights the necessity for national legal reforms to effectively prosecute global corporate offenders. Recommendations include strengthening cross-border jurisdiction, updating provisions on foreign public official bribery, enforcing stricter corporate sanctions, and harmonizing with international legal instruments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beneficial Ownership Transparency: Challenges and Policy Options for Indonesia. (2020). Global Financial Integrity. https://gfintegrity.org/report/beneficial-ownership-transparency-indonesia

Guidance on Beneficial Ownership. (2021). FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgene

Hadrian, E., Putri, A. H., & Hakim, L. (2022). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 3, 130–140. http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/25_PUU-IV_2016.pdf

Hasnda, N. A., & Alhuda, N. S. H. (2025). Eksistensi Perundang-undangan Anti Korupsi Indonesia dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Korporasi Multinasional: Analisis Teori Pilihan Rasional. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i2.4586

Laporan Tren Penindakan Korupsi. (n.d.). https://antikorupsi.org/id/artikel/laporan-tren-penindakan-korupsi-2022

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum.

Nagy, C. I. (2020). Trade Interests and Extraterritorial Value Considerations in New-Generation Free Trade Agreements: the Psychology of Redirection. 18(2), 128–161.

OECD. (2007). Asset Recovery: A Casebook for Practitioners. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/assetrecovery.htm

Transparency International. (2022). Exporting Corruption 2022: Assessing Enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. www.transparency.org

Wijayanti, N. (2024). PERAN NOTARIS DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP PEMILIK MANFAAT DARI KORPORASI DALAM RANGKA MENCEGAH TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DAN PENDANAAN TERORISME.

(2024). Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/968587cd-en

Downloads

Published

14-08-2025

How to Cite

KEJAHATAN KORUPSI OLEH KORPORASI GLOBAL MERUPAKAN ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP CELAH REGULASI DALAM HUKUM EKONOMI INDONESIA. (2025). Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(8), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.830

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.