Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Sistem Pidana Amerika Serikat, Malaysia, dan Singapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i11.1201Keywords:
Anti-corruption law, comparative legal system, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, institutional reform, criminal enforcement.Abstract
This study aims to analyze and compare the legal systems and enforcement models for combating corruption in three countries namely the United States, Malaysia, and Singapore while identifying key lessons that can be applied to strengthen Indonesia’s anti-corruption legal framework. Although all three countries demonstrate strong commitments to eradicating corruption, each employ distinct normative and institutional approaches. The United States relies on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which emphasizes corporate liability, global jurisdiction, and is enforced by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), supported by a robust whistleblower protection system. Malaysia, through the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, adopts a criminal law approach with a broad definition of gratification and reverse burden of proof under Section 50. Singapore, through its Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), demonstrates highly effective enforcement despite having relatively concise regulations, owing to institutional integrity, political commitment, and administrative consistency. This research employs a normative juridical method, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal sources include primary legal materials (statutes and regulations), secondary legal materials (literature and legal journals), and tertiary sources (legal dictionaries and encyclopedias). The analysis reveals that the success of anti-corruption systems does not solely depend on the severity of legal sanctions but on the consistency of enforcement, institutional independence, and political will. Therefore, Indonesia must undertake comprehensive legal reforms, including normative improvements, institutional strengthening, and broader public participation, to establish a sustainable, effective, and just anti-corruption legal system.
Downloads
References
Ade Lusy Irawati, Timbul Dompak & Etika Khairina, “Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia”.
Adinda Febriana & Viona Salsabila, “PENGATURAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (SUAP) MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DAN HUKUM PIDANA MALAYSIA” (2020) 1:1 DLJ, online: <https://ojs.umb-bungo.ac.id/index.php/DATIN/article/view/335>.
Anang Suhendra, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Kewenangan Lembaga AntiKorupsi Antara Indonesia Dengan Malaysia” (2023) 3.
Fahrizal S Siagian et al, “Justice based corruption eradication policy: A comparison between Indonesia and Denmark” (2024) Integritas: J Antikorupsi, online: <https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/1134>.
Florence Mok, “Corruption and Reforms in Colonial Hong Kong”.
Galin Zaihan Muzakki, “Perbandingan Lembaga Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Komparatif : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Indonesia dan Thailand)” (2025) 5:3 JIHHP 2183–2193.
Genoveva Puspitasari Larasati, “COMPARISON OF LAW IN INDONESIA AND SINGAPORE CONCERNING THE ERADICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION” (2021) 25:2.
Hendrio Hamid Pesik & Rahmat Dwi Putranto, “Renewal of Criminal Law in Combating Corruption Crimes”.
Heni Susanti & Wira Atma Hajri, “PERBANDINGAN ATURAN HUKUM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA”.
Jeremiah Timothy, Stanley Maxilian & Dave David Tedjokusumo, “PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA YANG MELARIKAN DIRI: KAJIAN YURIDIS ATAS PERJANJIAN EKSTRADISI ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN MALAYSIA” (2024) 5:1.
Khoirur Rizal Lutfi & Retno Anggoro Putri, “Optimalisasi Peran Bantuan Hukum Timbal Balik dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (2020) 3:1 UJH 33–57.
Lala Anggina Salsabila et al, “Studi Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Dan Malaysia” (2024) 2:2 Doktrin 01–12.
Manguni Wd Sinulingga & Jelly Leviza, “Perbandingan hukum perampasan aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, Singapura Dan Hongkong” (2023) 3:2 jn 329–335.
Muhammad Nur Ja’far, Rahmatul Hidayati & Budi Parmono, “PERBANDINGAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DENGAN PREDICATE CRIME KORUPSI DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA” (2024) 30.
Nafiatul Munawaroh, “Perbandingan Sistem Pengawasan Lembaga Antikorupsi Di Asia Pasifik” (2021) 6:3 JLR, online: <https://journal.uii.ac.id/Lex-Renaissance/article/view/19958/pdf>.
Oki Giri Pamungkas, Andriana Kusumawati & Aisha Mutiara Safitri, “Komparasi Hukum Pidana Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Singapura” (2024) 1:4 HMRM 105–109.
Rahmiati et al, “PERBANDINGAN LEMBAGA ANTI KORUPSI DI INDONESIA, SINGAPURA DAN HONGKONG” (2021) 1:1 EKSISHUM, online: <https://jurnal.untara.ac.id/index.php/eksishum/article/view/62>.
Rahmiati et al, “PERBANDINGAN LEMBAGA ANTI KORUPSI DI INDONESIA, SINGAPURA DAN HONGKONG” (2021) 1:1 EKSISHUM, online: <https://jurnal.untara.ac.id/index.php/eksishum/article/view/62>.
Rhendra Kusuma, “Perbandingan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia dengan Lembaga Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Negara Singapura, Hong Kong dan Malaysia”.
Rhendra Kusuma, “Perbandingan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana
Ridwan Arifin, Rodiyah Rodiyah & Fitria Puspita, “A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia’s KPK and Hong Kong ICAC in Eradicating Corruption” (2020) 2:2 home 163–179.
Ridwan et al, “Studi Komparatif Pemilihan Bentuk Pengaturan Tentang Model Penyusunan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia dan Malaysia: Comparative Study on the Choice of Regulatory Models for the Formulation of Corruption Crimes in the Anti-Corruption Laws of Indonesia and Malaysia” (2025) 26:1 LITIGASI 228–259.
Suci Nurlaeli, “ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA” (2023) 20.
Tasya Darosyifa & Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, “Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Malaysia” (2025) 2:2 Jembatan 378–388.
Tunjung Mahardika Hariadi, “PERBANDINGAN PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI NEGARA SINGAPURA DAN INDONESIA” (2013) 2:3.
Yuni Priskila Ginting et al, “Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Mengenai Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Negara Indonesia dan Negara Malaysia Berdasarkan Sistem Hukumnya” (2023) 2:6 JPWS 374–383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Satriya Aldi Putrazta (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
