PENGARUH TEKNOLOGI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TERHADAP KEABSAHAN ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PIDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2224Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, electronic evidence, criminal evidence, validity of evidence, digital forensics.Abstract
The development of information technology has encouraged changes in Indonesia’s criminal evidentiary system, particularly regarding the use of electronic evidence. The increasing use of digital data, such as video recordings, electronic mail, digital communications, and electronic documents, has made electronic evidence an important component in law enforcement processes. At the same time, the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents new challenges, as this technology is capable of generating and modifying images, videos, audio recordings, and digital documents with a high degree of resemblance to authentic data. This study aims to analyze the position of electronic evidence within Indonesia’s criminal evidentiary system and examine the influence of Artificial Intelligence on the validity of electronic evidence. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources in the form of legislation and secondary legal sources, including books, journals, and relevant scholarly articles. The results indicate that electronic evidence has gained legal recognition through the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions and has been further strengthened by Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, which explicitly recognizes electronic evidence as an independent and valid form of evidence. Nevertheless, the development of Artificial Intelligence may affect the validity of electronic evidence due to its capability to manipulate digital data. Therefore, verification mechanisms through digital forensic examinations, the implementation of the chain of custody principle, and expert testimony are necessary to ensure the authenticity, integrity, and reliability of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings.
Downloads
References
A. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3209.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4843.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025.
B. Jurnal da Artikel Ilmiah
Amsori, Fakhri Awaluddin, dan Momon Mulyana. “Tantangan dan Peran Digital Forensik dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan di Ranah Digital.” Journal Humaniora: Jurnal Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 2, No. 1 (2024): 14–19. https://journal.elena.co.id/index.php/humaniorum/article/download/35/28/200.
Ilham, Muhamad, Agus Salim, dan Sudarno. “Efektivitas Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Proses Pembuktian Menurut Hukum Acara Pidana.” Paulus Legal Research Vol. 3, No. 1 (2025). https://ojs.ukipaulus.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/938.
Kartadinata, Andriansyah. “Rekonstruksi Delik Pidana dalam Kejahatan Deepfake: Tantangan Pembuktian dan Perlindungan Korban.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Publik (MUARAKUM) Vol. 2, No. 1 (2026): 36–48. https://jurnal.muaraedukasi.id/index.php/muarakum/article/view/203/172.
Sari, Indah. “Kekuatan Keabsahan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Indonesia.” JSI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) Universitas Suryadarma Vol. 11, No. 2 (2024): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.35968/jsi.v11i2.1245.
Sebayang, Ekinia Karolin, Mahmud Mulyadi, dan Mohammad Ekaputra. “Potensi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Produk Lembaga Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol. 3, Issue 4 (2024): 317–327. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jalr/article/download/311/219/460.
C. Internet
Budhijanto, Danrivanto. “Digital Evidence di Era AI dan Sistem Pembuktian Terbuka dalam KUHAP Baru.” Hukumonline, 20 Januari 2026. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/digital-evidence-di-era-ai-dan-sistem-pembuktian-terbuka-dalam-kuhap-baru-lt696ef1b6e10f4/. Diakses pada 30 Mei 2026.
Hakim, Jefferson, dan Nael Yehezkiel. “Mempertanyakan Bukti Elektronik sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Kasus Pidana.” Hukumonline, 26 Juni 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mempertanyakan-bukti-elektronik-sebagai-alat-bukti-dalam-kasus-pidana-lt667b57ba9f459/. Diakses pada 1 Juli 2026.
Tambunan, Charl Lewis Jogi. “Dari KUHAP Lama ke KUHAP Baru: Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pembuktian Pidana.” MNL Law Office, 9 Februari 2026. https://mnllaw.co.id/dari-kuhap-lama-ke-kuhap-baru-analisis-perbandingan-sistem-pembuktian-pidana/. Diakses pada 31 Mei 2026.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nindia Rifdah Fakhirah (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










