Spiritual Authority and Political Adaptation: Sufism in Indonesia's New Order Era (1966–1998)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i1.1561Keywords:
Sufism, Tarekat, New Order, Political Islam, Spiritual Authority, Indonesia.Abstract
This article examines the complex and dynamic relationship between Sufism and state power during Indonesia's New Order period. It argues against the prevailing notion that Sufi orders (tarekat) were apolitical or merely retreatist spiritual movements. Instead, the study demonstrates how various tarekat, particularly the Qadiriyya wa Naqsyabandiyya (TQN), underwent significant processes of rationalization, bureaucratization, and political engagement. Through a historical-sociological analysis of primary and secondary literature, the article traces the transformation of Sufism from a primarily rural, charismatic-based tradition into a modern socio-political force. Key findings reveal a pattern of state co-optation, where the regime sought to harness the mass following of the tarekat for developmental legitimacy and political stability. Concurrently, Sufi leaders navigated the political landscape with diverse strategies ranging from active collaboration with the ruling Golkar party, to opposition through Islamic parties, to deliberate neutrality. This period also witnessed the rise of charismatic "living saints" (wali) whose spiritual authority was leveraged for political mobilization. Ultimately, the New Order era was not a period of Sufi decline but one of profound adaptation, where mystical Islam actively negotiated its place within an authoritarian modernizing state, leaving a lasting legacy on Indonesia's religious and political topography.
Downloads
References
1. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/books/9780804783095
2. Azra, A. (2014). NU: Islam Tradisional dan Modernitas di Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 4. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v4i4.770
3. Barton, G. (2002). Abdurrahman Wahid: Muslim Democrat, Indonesian President. [Publisher/City].
4. Bayat, A. (2007). Making Islam democratic: Social movements and the post-Islamist turn. Stanford University Press.
5. Bruinessen, M. van. (1994). NU: Tradisi, Relasi-relasi Kuasa, Pencarian Wacana Baru. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta.
6. Bruinessen, M. van. (2007). Saints, Politicians and Sufi Bureaucrats: Mysticism and Politics in Indonesia’s New Order. Dalam Sufism and the 'Modern' in Islam. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755607983.ch-006
7. Bruinessen, M. V., & Howell, J. D. (2007). Sufism and the 'Modern' in Islam. [Publisher].
8. Dhofier, Z. (1994). Tradisi Pesantren, Studi tentang Pandangan Hidup Kyai. Jakarta: LP3ES.
9. Eickelman, D. F., & Piscatori, J. (1996). Muslim politics: With a new preface by the authors. USA: Princeton University Press.
10. Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.
11. Hakim, B. (2024). Neo-Sufism as a Social Da'wah Paradigm: Addressing Challenges and Transforming Spirituality in Modern Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 1, 14-33. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijets.v1i3.336
12. Hakim, B. R. (2023). Tasawuf, Nasionalisme, dan Gerakan Sosial: Studi Spiritualitas Transformasional Abah Sepuh dalam Konteks Kolonialisme dan Kemerdekaan. Inovasi: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan, 2(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.55606/inovasi.v2i2.4761
13. Howell, J. (2001). Sufism and the Indonesian Islamic Revival. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60. https://doi.org/10.2307/2700107
14. Ibrahim, I. (2018). Relevansi nilai pendidikan karakter Gus Miek dalam buku Suluk Jalan Terabas Gus Miek karya M. Nurul Ibad dengan tujuan Pendidikan Islam (Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).
15. Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi Sejarah (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
16. Madinier, R. (2002). Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia, Robert W. Hefner: Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press, 2000. Moussons, 160-162. https://doi.org/10.4000/moussons.2633
17. Mulkhan, A. M. (1992). Runtuhnya mitos politik santri (Cet. 1). Yogyakarta: Sipress.
18. Rohimat, A. (2021). Sufi Modernis Peran Transformatif Mursyid TQN Suryalaya dalam bidang Pendidikan, Ekonomi dan Lingkungan Hidup. ESOTERIK, 7, 155-170. https://doi.org/10.21043/esoterik.v7i2.12747
19. Steenbrink, K. (2011). Tarekat Naqsyabandiyah di Indonesia. Survei Historis, Geografis dan Sosiologis (The Naqsyabandiyah Brotherhood in Indonesia). Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 25, 421-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246340001359X
20. Turmudi, E. (1995). Religion and Politics: A Study on Political Attitudes of Devout Muslims and the Role of the Kyai in Contemporary Java. Asian Journal of Social Science, 23(2), 18-41. https://doi.org/10.1163/030382495X00105
21. Turmudi, E. (2007). Struggling for the Umma: Changing Leadership Roles of Kiai in Jombang, East Java. https://doi.org/10.22459/SU.10.2006
22. Woodward, M. R. (1991). Islam in Java: Normative Piety and Mysticism in the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. American Ethnologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/AE.1991.18.4.02A00310
23. Zamzami, M., Mahzumi, F., & A’la, A. (2022). Tarekat and Politics in Indonesia: Contested Authority between Murshids in the Tarekat Qadiriyah wa Naqsyabandiyah in East Java. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 12(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2022.12.2.187-208
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Husein (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
