DESAIN PENELITIAN GROUNDED THEORY: LOGIKA METODOLOGIS DAN KONSTRUKSI TEORI KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PENDIDIKAN

Authors

  • Muhammad Abdillah Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin Author
  • Salamah Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin Author
  • Dina Hermina Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2088

Keywords:

grounded theory; research design; inductive methodology; educational research; symbolic interactionism.

Abstract

Traditional positivist frameworks in educational and social research often over-rely on pre-existing grand theories, resulting in the reduction and "dehumanization" of unique social contexts. Grounded Theory emerges as a rigorous inductive-abductive methodology to construct systematic theories directly rooted in empirical field data. This study aims to analyze the fundamental concepts, philosophical origins (symbolic interactionism), and methodological procedures of Grounded Theory, and to formulate its operational steps within educational research contexts. Operating as a qualitative-descriptive inquiry, this library research critically analyzes primary literature from Glaser, Strauss, Corbin, and Charmaz, utilizing content analysis and comparative triangulation to map out its systematic coding processes. The findings demonstrate that Grounded Theory is a comprehensive research design—rather than a mere data analysis technique—guided by key principles: theoretical sensitivity, theoretical sampling, the constant comparative method, structured coding (open, axial, and selective), memo writing, and theoretical saturation. A rigorous operational simulation of coding regarding facility provisioning for educational needs assessments is provided to illustrate its practical mechanics. The study concludes that Grounded Theory effectively bridges the gap between abstract grand theories and empirical reality, offering a robust, scientifically rigorous, and contextually responsive pathway to develop localized educational theories that are highly relevant to contemporary Indonesian and Islamic education management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Bungin, B. (2003). Analisis data penelitian kualitatif: Pemahaman filosofis dan metodologis ke arah penguasaan model aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London, England: Sage Publications.

Comte, A. (1830–1842). Course of positive philosophy.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset: Memilih di antara lima pendekatan (A. L. Lazuardi, Terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dewi, Y. I., Setyowati, & Afiyanti, Y. (2008). Stres dan koping perempuan hamil yang didiagnosis HIV/AIDS di DKI Jakarta: Studi grounded theory. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 12(2), 121-128.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.

Gunawan, I. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Teori dan pratama. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Mauhiburrohman, A. (2020). Anak muda dan majelis shalawat di Kabupaten Sleman: Analisis demografi sosial (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. (2008). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Paradigma baru ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London, England: Routledge.

Rahardjo, M. (2017). Studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: Konsep dan prosedur. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif: Tata langkah dan teknik-teknik terstandardisasi ngolah data kualitatif (M. Shodiq & I. Muttaqien, Terj.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulthana, S. (2016). Persepsi siswa tentang perpustakaan di Madrasah Aliyah Swasta Plus Al-Ulum Medan (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Weber, M. (n.d.). Economy and society.

Downloads

Published

04-06-2026

How to Cite

DESAIN PENELITIAN GROUNDED THEORY: LOGIKA METODOLOGIS DAN KONSTRUKSI TEORI KONTEKSTUAL DALAM PENDIDIKAN. (2026). Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 3(6), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i6.2088

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

31-40 of 702

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.