Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Menghadapi Tindak Pidana Siber Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI Crime) di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v3i9.2570Keywords:
Criminal Law Policy; Cybercrime; Artificial Intelligence; AI Crime; Law EnforcementAbstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has transformed various sectors of life, yet it has also given rise to new threats in the form of AI-based cybercrime that are complex and difficult to detect. This phenomenon is characterized by the emergence of cases such as deepfakes for identity fraud, personalized phishing, and autonomous cyberattacks that exploit machine learning algorithms. Indonesia, as a state based on law, faces serious challenges in combating these crimes due to normative gaps in existing legislation. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and its amendments, as well as Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), have not specifically regulated criminal acts that utilize artificial intelligence. This article examines the regulation of AI-based cybercrime in Indonesian positive law and formulates an ideal criminal law policy model through a normative approach with analysis of legislation, concepts, and cases. The research finds that criminal policy reformulation is needed at three stages: legislative policy with the formulation of new offenses that accommodate AI characteristics, applicative policy with strengthening the technical capacity of law enforcement officials, and executive policy with a punishment system oriented toward prevention. The criminal law approach needs to align with the utilitarian theory of punishment and adopt principles from international regulations such as the EU AI Act, while still adapting to the national legal context and Pancasila values.
Downloads
References
A. Buku
Abidin, A. Z. (2021). Hukum pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Arief, B. N. (2007). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Kencana.
Arief, B. N. (2022). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana: Perkembangan penyusunan konsep KUHP baru (Edisi Revisi). Kencana.
Bentham, J. (2022). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (Reprint ed.). Clarendon Press. (Karya asli diterbitkan 1789)
Gunawan, Y., & Kristian. (2023). Tindak pidana siber di Indonesia (Edisi Kedua). Refika Aditama.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2023). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana (Edisi Revisi). Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Muladi. (2005). Kapita selekta hukum pidana. Alumni.
Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2023). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana (Cetakan Kesembilan). Alumni.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2024). Kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana dalam menghadapi perkembangan teknologi. Pustaka Utama.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sunggono, B. (2003). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Turner, J. (2019). Robot rules: Regulating artificial intelligence. Palgrave Macmillan.
B. Jurnal Ilmiah
Anwar, H. M. (2024). Forensik digital dalam penanganan tindak pidana siber. Jurnal Forensik Digital Indonesia, 1(1), 15-22.
Calo, R. (2015). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3), 513-563.
Dietterich, T. G. (2017). Steps toward robust artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 38(3), 3-24.
Hamilton, C. (2024). Cybercrime prevention through artificial intelligence monitoring. Journal of Cybersecurity, 10(2), 112-125.
Hanum, L. G. (2026). AI tanpa batas? Menakar perlindungan hukum atas data pribadi di Indonesia. FKPH Universitas Brawijaya, 3-6.
Jurcys, P. (2021). Legal personality of artificial intelligence. European Journal of Law and Technology, 12(1), 1-18.
Nurkholisah, S., Rismana, D., Nugroho, A. E., et al. (2025). Deepfake sebagai bentuk kejahatan siber baru: Tantangan kriminalisasi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(3), 7-10.
Respati, A. A. (2024). Reformulasi UU ITE terhadap artificial intelligence dibandingkan dengan Uni Eropa dan China AI Act Regulation. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 12-15.
Said, M. U. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam kejahatan siber. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 30(2), 250-265.
Sulihandari, H. (2022). Penegakan hukum pidana siber di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 52(3), 456-470.
C. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 139.
Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Nasional). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1.
Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 1.
Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial.
Indonesia. (2023). Keputusan Kapolri Nomor 53 Tahun 2023 tentang Pembentukan Satuan Tugas Cyber Crime and Artificial Intelligence.
D. Laporan dan Dokumen Resmi
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional (BPHN). (2024). Policy brief: Pengaturan kecerdasan artifisial dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. BPHN Kementerian Hukum RI.
Europol Innovation Lab. (2024). Law enforcement and the challenge of deepfakes. The Hague: Europol.
INTERPOL. (2024). Global cybercrime threat assessment 2024. Singapore: INTERPOL.
Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2025, Januari). Rilis pengungkapan kasus penipuan menggunakan deepfake Presiden RI dan Menteri Keuangan. Divisi Humas Polri.
Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. (2025). Putusan Perkara Nomor 123/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Jkt.Pst tentang tindak pidana siber deepfake. Jakarta: Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat.
OECD. (2024). OECD artificial intelligence review 2024: Artificial intelligence, data and governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
UNESCO. (2024). Guidance for the governance of generative artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). Artificial intelligence and criminal justice system: Emerging challenges. Vienna: UNODC.
World Economic Forum. (2025). Global cybersecurity outlook 2025. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
E. Sumber Lain (Wawancara/Diskusi)
Dhiratara, A. (2024, Agustus 15). Tantangan dan dilema AI bagi media dan jurnalis [Diskusi Online]. CEO Hukumonline.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, 12 July 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Faska Setianda, Selamat Lumban Gaol (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
